Rodney v. Yale Realty LLC, 17-cv-3921 (BMC) (LB). (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20171207d96
Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER BRIAN M. COGAN , District Judge . This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom [30], recommending that this Court dismiss the case because plaintiff pro se failed to attend either of two conferences that she had scheduled, despite multiple warnings that the case would be dismissed if she did not. Plaintiff's non-appearance is not surprising. I had earlier observed that this action appeared to be an effort to delay plaintiff's evictio
Summary: ORDER BRIAN M. COGAN , District Judge . This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom [30], recommending that this Court dismiss the case because plaintiff pro se failed to attend either of two conferences that she had scheduled, despite multiple warnings that the case would be dismissed if she did not. Plaintiff's non-appearance is not surprising. I had earlier observed that this action appeared to be an effort to delay plaintiff's eviction..
More
ORDER
BRIAN M. COGAN, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Lois Bloom [30], recommending that this Court dismiss the case because plaintiff pro se failed to attend either of two conferences that she had scheduled, despite multiple warnings that the case would be dismissed if she did not. Plaintiff's non-appearance is not surprising. I had earlier observed that this action appeared to be an effort to delay plaintiff's eviction pursuant to a state court order for about two weeks, until such time as she entered other premises on a new lease. When I denied the temporary restraining order that would have stopped the state court proceeding, she showed no further interest in the case.
Accordingly, I adopt the Report and Recommendation as the Order of this Court, and the case is dismissed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(f) and 37(b)(2)(A).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
