R.B. Development, CO., LTD v. Tutis Capital LLC, 12-CV-1460 (CBA) (SMG) (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. New York
Number: infdco20171213g40
Visitors: 8
Filed: Dec. 11, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2017
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION MEMORANDUM & ORDER CAROL BAGLEY AMON , District Judge . The Court has received the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Steven M. Gold, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending that Tutis Capital LLC and Thomas A. Lawson's motion for a default judgment be granted against defendant Goldie Dickie and that they be permitted to move for entry of default judgment within three weeks of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation. ( See D.E.# 156.) No
Summary: NOT FOR PUBLICATION MEMORANDUM & ORDER CAROL BAGLEY AMON , District Judge . The Court has received the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Steven M. Gold, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending that Tutis Capital LLC and Thomas A. Lawson's motion for a default judgment be granted against defendant Goldie Dickie and that they be permitted to move for entry of default judgment within three weeks of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation. ( See D.E.# 156.) No ..
More
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
CAROL BAGLEY AMON, District Judge.
The Court has received the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of the Honorable Steven M. Gold, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending that Tutis Capital LLC and Thomas A. Lawson's motion for a default judgment be granted against defendant Goldie Dickie and that they be permitted to move for entry of default judgment within three weeks of any Order adopting this Report and Recommendation. (See D.E.# 156.)
No party has objected to the R&R, and the time for doing so has passed. When deciding whether to adopt a report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). To accept those portions of the R&R to which no timely objection has been made,"a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Jarvis V. N. Am. Globex Fund. L.P., 823 F.Supp.2d 161, 163 (E.D.N.Y. 2011) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).
The Court has reviewed the record and, finding no clear error, adopts the well-reasoned R&R as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
