Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Thomas v. Miller, 17-CV-1519 (RRM) (RLM). (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. New York Number: infdco20180102982 Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 01, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 01, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ROSLYNN R. MAUSKOPF , District Judge . Plaintiff Keosha Thomas brought this civil rights action on March 17, 2017. Since then, Thomas has not communicated with the Court in any way. All but one ofthe Court's mailings to Thomas were returned as undeliverable. ( See (Doc. Nos. 9, 10, 12, 13).) On May 8, 2017, Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann issued an Order, warning Thomas that failure to update her address or to respond would result in a recommendati
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Keosha Thomas brought this civil rights action on March 17, 2017. Since then, Thomas has not communicated with the Court in any way. All but one ofthe Court's mailings to Thomas were returned as undeliverable. (See (Doc. Nos. 9, 10, 12, 13).) On May 8, 2017, Magistrate Judge Roanne L. Mann issued an Order, warning Thomas that failure to update her address or to respond would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed as abandoned. (See Order (Doc. No. 11).) Thomas did not respond, and on June 13, 2017, Judge Mann issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R"), recommending that the case be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (R&R (Doc. No. 14).) Judge Mann reminded the parties that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure ("Rule") 72(b), any objection to the R&R must be filed within fourteen days of service. (See R&R at 4.)1 The Court mailed a copy of the R&R to the address Thomas provided in the complaint.2 (Id.) No party has filed any objection, and the time to do so has since expired.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Rule 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, concurs with the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F.Supp.2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007).

Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment pursuant to this Order and close the case. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this Order and the accompanying Judgment to the defendants at the addresses indicated on the docket and to note the mailing on the docket.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. For ease of reference, citations to Court documents utilize the Electronic Case Filing System ("ECF") pagination.
2. The Court notes that, as with the Court's other mailings, the R&R was returned as undeliverable. (Doc. No. 15.)
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer