Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mora v. Bareburger Group LLC, 16-CV-04373 (FB) (RML). (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. New York Number: infdco20181012e20 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 11, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER FREDERIC BLOCK , Senior District Judge . Plaintiffs are pursuing a collective action under the Fair Labor and Standards Act. On May 18, 2018, counsel reported that the parties have been able to reach a settlement, and counsel for all parties submitted Consents to Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. Shortly thereafter, this Court assigned the case to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy for all further proceedings, including the entry of final judgment. On Jun
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Plaintiffs are pursuing a collective action under the Fair Labor and Standards Act. On May 18, 2018, counsel reported that the parties have been able to reach a settlement, and counsel for all parties submitted Consents to Jurisdiction by a United States Magistrate Judge. Shortly thereafter, this Court assigned the case to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Levy for all further proceedings, including the entry of final judgment.

On June 7, the Magistrate Judge held a conference call at which counsel Clara Lam explained that she had been unable to reach two of her clients—named plaintiff Adan Hernandez-Riveros and opt-in plaintiff Balla Niambele—since mid-April. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge held that the May 18 Consents to Jurisdiction were ineffective as to those parties and that he did not have jurisdiction over their claims for the purposes of settlement or voluntary dismissal. He ordered counsel to continue trying to reach the parties, but plaintiffs' counsel C.K. Lee informed the Court that the firm had still been unable to reach either one despite trying for over a week through the various means the Magistrate Judge had instructed counsel to use.

The settlement is unable to proceed without a resolution as to these parties' involvement because by its terms it depends on their participation or withdrawal. Thus, on July 12, the Magistrate Judge sua sponte issued a Report and Recommendation that Hernandez-Riveros's and Niambele's claims be dismissed without prejudice for lack of prosecution.

On July 26, exactly fourteen days after the issuance of the Report and Recommendation, Lee informed the Court that he was able to reach Niambele (but not Hernandez-Riversos), and that Niambele still wishes to participate in the action. He therefore objected to the Report and Recommendation insofar as it pertained to the dismissal of Niambele's claims.

The Court sustains the timely objection. The Court therefore partially adopts the Report and Recommendation as it pertains to Hernandez-Riveros and partially declines to adopt it as pertains to Niambele. Furthermore, the objection is construed as a ratification of the earlier Consent to Jurisdiction by Niambele, which had been signed without his authorization. Magistrate Judge Levy continues to have jurisdiction over all further proceedings, including the request for approval of settlement agreements. See Dkt. No. 91.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer