McFADDEN v. FINTON, 9:09-CV-1415. (2014)
Court: District Court, N.D. New York
Number: infdco20140623a53
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 20, 2014
Summary: DECISION & ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 64] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. II. DISCUSSION After examining the record, this Court has determined tha
Summary: DECISION & ORDER THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 64] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired. II. DISCUSSION After examining the record, this Court has determined that..
More
DECISION & ORDER
THOMAS J. McAVOY, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. Andrew T. Baxter, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 64] have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.
II. DISCUSSION
After examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice.
III. CONCLUSION
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report-Recommendation [dkt. # 64] for the reasons stated therein. Defendants' motion for summary judgment [dkt. # 62] is GRANTED, and the complaint is DISMISSED IN ITS ENTIRETY.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
