Elawyers Elawyers

SPIEWAK v. A.O. SMITH WATER PRODUCTS, 1:17-CV-40 (FJS/DJS). (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. New York Number: infdco20170124d20 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 23, 2017
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2017
Summary: ORDER FREDERICK J. SCULLIN, Jr. , District Judge . On January 13, 2017, Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation filed a Notice of Removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1442(a). See Dkt. No. 1. Under 1442, joinder of the other Defendants in this action was not necessary. However, as 28 U.S.C. 1446(d) requires, Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation did provide notice to the other Defendants regarding the filing of its Notice of Removal. See Dkt. No. 6. On January 20, 2017, Plaintiffs and Def
More

ORDER

On January 13, 2017, Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation filed a Notice of Removal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a). See Dkt. No. 1. Under § 1442, joinder of the other Defendants in this action was not necessary. However, as 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d) requires, Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation did provide notice to the other Defendants regarding the filing of its Notice of Removal. See Dkt. No. 6.

On January 20, 2017, Plaintiffs and Defendant Lockheed Martin Corporation filed a stipulation in which they agreed to the remand of this action to the New York Supreme Court, County of Schenectady. See Dkt. No. 20.

Based on this stipulation, the Court hereby

ORDERS that this action is remanded to the New York Supreme Court, County of Schenectady; and the Court further

ORDERS that the Clerk of the Court shall mail a certified copy of this Order to the Clerk of the New York Supreme Court, County of Schenectady as 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) requires.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer