Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MORRIS v. MARTIN, 5:16-CV-601 (NAM/TWD) (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. New York Number: infdco20170323f06 Visitors: 21
Filed: Mar. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 22, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER NORMAN A. MORDUE , Senior District Judge . Presently before the Court is the January 5, 2017 Order and Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 27) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Th r se Wiley Dancks upon initial review of plaintiff's pro se amended complaint. Magistrate Judge Dancks recommends that the amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice as against District Attorney Soares and Albany County and allowed to proceed against the remaining defendants J
More

MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER

Presently before the Court is the January 5, 2017 Order and Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 27) issued by United States Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks upon initial review of plaintiff's pro se amended complaint. Magistrate Judge Dancks recommends that the amended complaint be dismissed with prejudice as against District Attorney Soares and Albany County and allowed to proceed against the remaining defendants Jason Martin, Jason Seward, Steve Korkoff, and the City of Albany. On January 20, 2017, plaintiff filed an objection (Dkt. No. 32).

The Court has conducted de novo review of the Report-Recommendation, plaintiff's objection, and the entire file. The Court adopts and accepts the Report-Recommendation.

While the Report and Recommendation was still pending before this Court, defendants Jason Martin, Jason Seward, Steve Korkoff, and the City of Albany moved (Dkt. No. 34) to dismiss the action. The Court denied the premature motion without prejudice (Dkt. No. 37). Plaintiff then filed papers (Dkt. No. 38) in opposition to defendant's dismissal motion. Now that the Court has accepted the Report-Recommendation, the defendants' dismissal motion is properly before the Court. Accordingly, the Court reopens defendants' motion (Dkt. No. 34) and vacates the Order (Dkt. No. 37) denying the motion without prejudice. Defendants are not required to re-file their motion papers, nor is plaintiff required to re-file his opposition.

It is therefore

ORDERED that the Report-Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thérèse Wiley Dancks (Dkt. No. 27) is adopted and accepted; and it is further

ORDERED that the amended complaint is dismissed with prejudice as against District Attorney Soares and Albany County; and it is further

ORDERED that the case shall proceed against the remaining defendants Jason Martin, Jason Seward, Steve Korkoff, and the City of Albany; and it is further

ORDERED that the Order (Dkt. No. 37) denying defendants' motion without prejudice is vacated; and it is further

ORDERED that the clerk of the Court is directed to reopen defendants' motion at (Dkt. No. 34); and it is further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to serve copies of this Memorandum-Decision and Order in accordance with the Local Rules of the Northern District of New York.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer