Filed: Dec. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2018
Summary: DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY , Chief District Judge . Currently before the Court, in this pro se prisoner civil rights action filed by Murray Hall, III ("Plaintiff") against the five above-captioned employees of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("Defendants") are (1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment and (2) United States Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles' Report-Recommendation recommending that Defendants' motion be granted. (Dkt. Nos.
Summary: DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY , Chief District Judge . Currently before the Court, in this pro se prisoner civil rights action filed by Murray Hall, III ("Plaintiff") against the five above-captioned employees of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("Defendants") are (1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment and (2) United States Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles' Report-Recommendation recommending that Defendants' motion be granted. (Dkt. Nos. 2..
More
DECISION and ORDER
GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief District Judge.
Currently before the Court, in this pro se prisoner civil rights action filed by Murray Hall, III ("Plaintiff") against the five above-captioned employees of the New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision ("Defendants") are (1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment and (2) United States Magistrate Judge David E. Peebles' Report-Recommendation recommending that Defendants' motion be granted. (Dkt. Nos. 23, 32.) None of the parties have filed objections to the Report-Recommendation, and the deadline by which to do so has expired. (See generally Docket Sheet.)
After carefully reviewing the relevant papers herein, including Magistrate Judge Peebles' thorough Report-Recommendation, the Court can find no clear-error in the Report-Recommendation.1 Magistrate Judge Peebles employed the proper standards, accurately recited the facts, and reasonably applied the law to those facts. As a result, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in its entirety for the reasons stated therein;2 Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted; and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is dismissed in its entirety.
ACCORDINGLY, it is
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Peebles' Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 32) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in its entirety; and it is further
ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 23) is GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 13) is DISMISSED in its entirety, and the Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment for Defendants and close this action.
The Court certifies that an appeal from this Decision and Order would not be taken in good faith pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).