Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

KOSOGLIAD v. C.O. BAKARE, 13 Civ. 7167 (GBD)(DCF). (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20150116a23 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jan. 15, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Evgeni Kosogliad commenced this action against Defendants Bakare, Canty, and Purvis, Department of Corrections officers at the Anna M. Kross Center, for violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. 1983. On March 10, 2014, Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. On August 22, 2014 and September 16, 2014, Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman directed Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' motion, but Plaintiff fail
More

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge.

Pro se Plaintiff Evgeni Kosogliad commenced this action against Defendants Bakare, Canty, and Purvis, Department of Corrections officers at the Anna M. Kross Center, for violations of his civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 10, 2014, Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. On August 22, 2014 and September 16, 2014, Magistrate Judge Debra Freeman directed Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' motion, but Plaintiff failed to do so. On December 5, 2014, Magistrate Judge Freeman issued an order to show cause why she should not recommend dismissing this case without prejudice for failure to prosecute. In her Report and Recommendation issued on December 31, 2014, Magistrate Judge Freeman advises this Court that she has not received any written submission or other communication from Plaintiff, and recommends that this case be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. This case is dismissed without prejudice.1

The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

FootNotes


1. Magistrate Judge advised the parties that pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b) failure to file objections to the Report within fourteen days would result in their waiver and preclude appellate review. See Report at 2. There were no objections filed.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer