Filed: Apr. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER EDGARDO RAMOS , District Judge . On April 16, 2018, this Court issued an order affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Court below and sanctioning Appellant Neelam Uppal ("Uppal") in the amount of $5,000. See Doc. 67. Uppal has filed a notice of appeal and a motion for stay pending appeal. See Docs. 69-70. Appellees The Health Law Firm and George Indest ("Health Law") have filed a request that this court require Uppal to pay some or all of the sanctions, costs, and a
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER EDGARDO RAMOS , District Judge . On April 16, 2018, this Court issued an order affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Court below and sanctioning Appellant Neelam Uppal ("Uppal") in the amount of $5,000. See Doc. 67. Uppal has filed a notice of appeal and a motion for stay pending appeal. See Docs. 69-70. Appellees The Health Law Firm and George Indest ("Health Law") have filed a request that this court require Uppal to pay some or all of the sanctions, costs, and at..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
EDGARDO RAMOS, District Judge.
On April 16, 2018, this Court issued an order affirming the decision of the Bankruptcy Court below and sanctioning Appellant Neelam Uppal ("Uppal") in the amount of $5,000. See Doc. 67. Uppal has filed a notice of appeal and a motion for stay pending appeal. See Docs. 69-70. Appellees The Health Law Firm and George Indest ("Health Law") have filed a request that this court require Uppal to pay some or all of the sanctions, costs, and attorney's fees imposed against her before proceeding with an appeal. See Doc. 71.
The Court DENIES Uppal's request for a stay pending appeal to the Second Circuit largely for the same reasons it denied her request for a stay pending the Court's decision on her appeal in November 2017. See Doc. 35. Namely, although Uppal has presented several arguments, she has not shown that she has a likelihood of success on the merits, nor has she shown that she may suffer irreparable harm if a stay is not granted.
Although the Court will not grant Uppal's request for a stay, it also will not exercise its discretion to impede her right to appeal. Therefore, Health Law's request, which asks that the Court require Uppal to pay or post a bond representing the amount awarded against her below, is also DENIED.
It is SO ORDERED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions (Docs. 70 and 71) and to mail a copy of this order to Taneja.
