Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Poulos v. City of New York, 14 CV 3023-LTS-BCM. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20180807g75 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses' July 13, 2018, Report and Recommendation (the "Report") (docket entry no. 109), which recommends that plaintiff be awarded (i) $100,000 in compensatory damages against Defendant Brown, (ii) $75,000 in punitive damages against Defendant Brown, (iii) $325,003 in compensatory damages against Defendant McFadden, and (iv) $21,418.75 in attorneys' fees and $724.09 in costs to be paid by Defendant Br
More

ORDER

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Barbara Moses' July 13, 2018, Report and Recommendation (the "Report") (docket entry no. 109), which recommends that plaintiff be awarded (i) $100,000 in compensatory damages against Defendant Brown, (ii) $75,000 in punitive damages against Defendant Brown, (iii) $325,003 in compensatory damages against Defendant McFadden, and (iv) $21,418.75 in attorneys' fees and $724.09 in costs to be paid by Defendant Brown. No objections to the Report have been received.

In reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate [judge]." 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(C) (LexisNexis 2017). "In a case such as this one, where no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Johnson v. New York University School of Education, No. 00 Civ. 8117, at *1, 2003 WL 21433443 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2003).

The Court has reviewed carefully Magistrate Judge Moses' thorough and well-reasoned Report and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to enter judgment accordingly and close this case.

This Order resolves docket entry no. 103.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer