Filed: Jul. 27, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 27, 2018
Summary: REPORT & RECOMMENDATION LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN , Magistrate Judge . TO: THE HONORABLE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FROM: KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On June 14, 2018, the undersigned granted Plaintiffs' former counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record. (Doc. No. 42.) The Court then ordered Plaintiffs to obtain new counsel by July 9, 2018, or the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 44.) On July 6, 2018, Mr. Carl George,
Summary: REPORT & RECOMMENDATION LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN , Magistrate Judge . TO: THE HONORABLE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FROM: KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE On June 14, 2018, the undersigned granted Plaintiffs' former counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record. (Doc. No. 42.) The Court then ordered Plaintiffs to obtain new counsel by July 9, 2018, or the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 44.) On July 6, 2018, Mr. Carl George, ..
More
REPORT & RECOMMENDATION
LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Magistrate Judge.
TO: THE HONORABLE LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE FROM: KATHARINE H. PARKER, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On June 14, 2018, the undersigned granted Plaintiffs' former counsel's motion to withdraw as counsel of record. (Doc. No. 42.) The Court then ordered Plaintiffs to obtain new counsel by July 9, 2018, or the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. (Doc. No. 44.) On July 6, 2018, Mr. Carl George, Chairman of Champion's League, Inc. faxed a letter to the Court seeking an extension of time for Plaintiffs to obtain new counsel, which the Court granted. (Doc. No. 51.) On July 10, 2018, Defendants filed a letter requesting that the Court dismiss the action with prejudice because Plaintiffs failed to obtain new counsel. (Doc. No. 49.) As the Court had extended Plaintiffs' deadline to obtain new counsel, and as Plaintiffs have obtained new counsel who have duly filed notices of appearances in this action, this Court recommends that Defendants' request (at doc. no. 49) be denied as moot.
The foregoing recommendation is adopted. DE # 49 resolved.
SO ORDERED.
