Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Intrepidus, LLC v. Bivins, 15-CV-7721-LTS-HBP. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191009a00 Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 01, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 01, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Pitman's September 16, 2019, Report and Recommendation (the "Report") (docket entry no. 90) which recommends that (i) judgment be entered against Defendant Glenn J. Bivins awarding Plaintiff Intrepidus, LLC $35,500.00 in damages, and that (ii) Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees and costs be denied. No objections to the Report have been received. In reviewing a report an
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Pitman's September 16, 2019, Report and Recommendation (the "Report") (docket entry no. 90) which recommends that (i) judgment be entered against Defendant Glenn J. Bivins awarding Plaintiff Intrepidus, LLC $35,500.00 in damages, and that (ii) Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees and costs be denied. No objections to the Report have been received.

In reviewing a report and recommendation, a district court "may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate [judge]." 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(C) (LexisNexis 2017). "In a case such as this one, where no timely objection has been made, a district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record." Johnson v. New York University School of Education, No. 00 Civ. 8117, at *1, 2003 WL 21433443 (S.D.N.Y. June 16, 2003).

The Court has reviewed carefully Magistrate Judge Pitman's thorough and wellreasoned Report and Recommendation and finds no clear error. The Court therefore adopts the Report in its entirety for the reasons stated therein. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor as against Defendant Glenn J. Bivins in the amount of $35,500.00. Plaintiff's request for attorneys' fees and costs is denied. This Order resolves docket entry nos. 82 and 90.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer