Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Walsh, 09 CV 1749 (GBD). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191120894 Visitors: 21
Filed: Nov. 13, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2019
Summary: FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT STEPHEN WALSH GEORGE B. DANIELS , District Judge . WHEREAS the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("Commission") having filed a Complaint and Defendant Stephen Walsh ("Defendant") having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of a Consent Order of Permanent Injunction and Ancillary Equitable Relief which included Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; and
More

FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANT STEPHEN WALSH

WHEREAS the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("Commission") having filed a Complaint and Defendant Stephen Walsh ("Defendant") having entered a general appearance; consented to the Court's jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action; consented to entry of a Consent Order of Permanent Injunction and Ancillary Equitable Relief which included Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law; and waived any right to appeal from the Consent Order of Permanent Injunction ("Walsh Permanent Injunction");

WHEREAS the Court having entered the Walsh Permanent Injunction on August 20, 2014 (docket no. 780);

WHEREAS a forfeiture money judgment was entered against Walsh in a parallel criminal proceeding in the amount of $50,743,779, constituting the total proceeds he personally received as a result of the felony violation to which he pled guilty;

WHEREAS the Commission having withdrawn its claims for any further relief;

NOW, THEREFORE:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Walsh Permanent Injunction (D.E. 780) previously entered by this Court on August 20, 2014, shall constitute the FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT STEPHEN WALSH in favor of the Commission.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of resolving the ongoing receivership, resolving any and all claims against any other remaining defendants or relief defendants, and for enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment.

There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer