Intimo, Inc. v. Harleysville Preferred Insurance Company, 1:19-cv-4734-GHW. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20191121c77
Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS , District Judge . The parties' application to adjourn current discovery deadlines while participating in mediation is granted. The deadlines in the case management plan are adjourned sine die. The parties are directed to write the Court by January 15, 2020, updating the Court on the status of the parties' settlement conversations, and proposing new discovery deadlines should mediation prove unsuccessful. The Court has entered a reference to the assigned magistrate ju
Summary: ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS , District Judge . The parties' application to adjourn current discovery deadlines while participating in mediation is granted. The deadlines in the case management plan are adjourned sine die. The parties are directed to write the Court by January 15, 2020, updating the Court on the status of the parties' settlement conversations, and proposing new discovery deadlines should mediation prove unsuccessful. The Court has entered a reference to the assigned magistrate jud..
More
ORDER
GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge.
The parties' application to adjourn current discovery deadlines while participating in mediation is granted. The deadlines in the case management plan are adjourned sine die. The parties are directed to write the Court by January 15, 2020, updating the Court on the status of the parties' settlement conversations, and proposing new discovery deadlines should mediation prove unsuccessful. The Court has entered a reference to the assigned magistrate judge for settlement by separate order.
In light of parties' request for mediation, Defendant's motion to dismiss, Dkt. No. 35, will be considered withdrawn. When the parties update the Court, Defendant may renew its motion to dismiss.
The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 35. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 45 as the Court has issued the requested letters rogatory.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
