U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Collector's Coffee Inc., 19 Civ. 4355 (LGS) (GWG). (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20191202a07
Visitors: 5
Filed: Nov. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2019
Summary: ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN , Magistrate Judge . With regard to Docket ## 154 and 156, the Court does not understand from the Dodgers' letter (# 154) that the Dodgers are seeking a stay of all discovery. It is for this reason that the Court does not see why the Dodgers would be prejudiced by disclosing the information required under Rule 26(a)(1). After all, without a stay, the "Holders" would be free to seek the same information (and more) by means of interrogatories and document requests
Summary: ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN , Magistrate Judge . With regard to Docket ## 154 and 156, the Court does not understand from the Dodgers' letter (# 154) that the Dodgers are seeking a stay of all discovery. It is for this reason that the Court does not see why the Dodgers would be prejudiced by disclosing the information required under Rule 26(a)(1). After all, without a stay, the "Holders" would be free to seek the same information (and more) by means of interrogatories and document requests u..
More
ORDER
GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, Magistrate Judge.
With regard to Docket ## 154 and 156, the Court does not understand from the Dodgers' letter (# 154) that the Dodgers are seeking a stay of all discovery. It is for this reason that the Court does not see why the Dodgers would be prejudiced by disclosing the information required under Rule 26(a)(1). After all, without a stay, the "Holders" would be free to seek the same information (and more) by means of interrogatories and document requests under Fed. R. Civ. P. 33, 34.
The due date of the Rule 26(a)(1) disclosures is extended until December 9, 2019. The parties may extend this date by mutual agreement and without Court order.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
