Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Liverpool v. City of New York, 18-CV-1354 (PAE) (BCM). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191202a41 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 26, 2019
Summary: ORDER BARBARA MOSES , Magistrate Judge . The Court has received and reviewed pro se plaintiff Anton F. Liverpool's letter filed November 25, 2019 (Dkt. No. 64), which attaches fifteen pages of executed medical releases (the Releases) (Dkt. No. 64-1). Plaintiff states that he sent the Releases to defendants, under separate cover, and explains that he is filing them with the Court "in an attempt at showing transparency" and "in an attempt to understand if I have been incorrectly filling out
More

ORDER

The Court has received and reviewed pro se plaintiff Anton F. Liverpool's letter filed November 25, 2019 (Dkt. No. 64), which attaches fifteen pages of executed medical releases (the Releases) (Dkt. No. 64-1). Plaintiff states that he sent the Releases to defendants, under separate cover, and explains that he is filing them with the Court "in an attempt at showing transparency" and "in an attempt to understand if I have been incorrectly filling out these forms."

The Court did not prepare the Releases, and does not ordinarily require (or permit) the parties to file medical releases on the public docket. Among other things, the Releases reveal plaintiff's birth date and social security number — information which, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2(a), should be redacted from any publicly-filed document.

Plaintiff may contact counsel for defendants to determine whether the Releases, as executed, are sufficient for defendants' purposes.

The Clerk of Court is directed to (1) restrict access to Dkt. No. 64-1 to case participants only; and (2) mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff pro se.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer