Farooqi v. New York City Department of Education, 19cv3436 (DLC). (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20191203834
Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENISE COTE , District Judge . A pretrial conference was held pursuant to Rule 16, Fed. R. Civ. P., on November 22, 2019. For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted with respect to the plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims for: (1) age discrimination, (2) malicious abuse of process, and (3) stigma plus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with their Rule 26(a)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., init
Summary: ORDER DENISE COTE , District Judge . A pretrial conference was held pursuant to Rule 16, Fed. R. Civ. P., on November 22, 2019. For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted with respect to the plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. 1983 claims for: (1) age discrimination, (2) malicious abuse of process, and (3) stigma plus. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with their Rule 26(a)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., initi..
More
ORDER
DENISE COTE, District Judge.
A pretrial conference was held pursuant to Rule 16, Fed. R. Civ. P., on November 22, 2019. For the reasons stated on the record, it is hereby
ORDERED that the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings is granted with respect to the plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims for: (1) age discrimination, (2) malicious abuse of process, and (3) stigma plus.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with their Rule 26(a)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., initial disclosure obligations by December 13, 2019.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a schedule will be set that governs the further conduct of pretrial proceedings pending this Court's ruling on the defendants' motion for judgment on the pleadings with respect to the plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim for prior alienage and race discrimination, upon which the Court reserved judgment at the November 22 conference.
Source: Leagle
