Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Brannon v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 17-CV-6024 (RA). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191203f70 Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 02, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2019
Summary: ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS , District Judge . On August 9, 2019, Defendant the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey filed a motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. 117. As of today's date, the Court has not received a response from Plaintiff as to the Port Authority's motion (although it has received an opposition to the Delta Defendants' motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. 131). No later than December 23, 2019, Plaintiff shall file either a response to the Port Authority's motion for sum
More

ORDER

On August 9, 2019, Defendant the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey filed a motion for summary judgment. See Dkt. 117. As of today's date, the Court has not received a response from Plaintiff as to the Port Authority's motion (although it has received an opposition to the Delta Defendants' motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. 131). No later than December 23, 2019, Plaintiff shall file either a response to the Port Authority's motion for summary judgment or a letter indicating that he does not intend to file a response but nonetheless seeks to pursue this against action the Port Authority. If Plaintiff informs the Court that he intends to pursue this action against the Port Authority, but chooses not to oppose the Port Authority's motion, then the Court will deem that motion fully briefed and take it under submission. See Lue v. JPMorgan & Chase Co., 768 F. App'x 7, 10 (2d Cir. 2019) ("Where a motion for summary judgment is unopposed, summary judgment is proper only if the court is satisfied that the moving party has met its burden with sufficient support in the record evidence.") (citing Vt. Teddy Bear Co. v. 1-800 Beargram Co., 373 F.3d 241,244 (2d Cir. 2004)). If, however, Plaintiff does not respond to this Order, either by responding to the Port Authority's motion or by submitting a letter indicating that he does not intend to do so, then the Court may dismiss this action, as against the Port Authority, for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer