Excelled Sheepskin & Leather Coat Corp. v. Oregon Brewing Company, 12 CIVIL 1416(GBD). (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20191209d49
Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 06, 2019
Summary: RULE 54(b) JUDGMENT GEORGE B. DANIELS , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 5, 2019, there is no just reason for delay, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b),judgment is entered that Oregon Brewing Company's motion is granted; Excelled's claims for trademark counterfeiting under 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(b) (Count I), trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a) (Count II), false designation of origin a
Summary: RULE 54(b) JUDGMENT GEORGE B. DANIELS , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 5, 2019, there is no just reason for delay, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b),judgment is entered that Oregon Brewing Company's motion is granted; Excelled's claims for trademark counterfeiting under 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(b) (Count I), trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. 1114(1)(a) (Count II), false designation of origin an..
More
RULE 54(b) JUDGMENT
GEORGE B. DANIELS, District Judge.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 5, 2019, there is no just reason for delay, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b),judgment is entered that Oregon Brewing Company's motion is granted; Excelled's claims for trademark counterfeiting under 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(b) (Count I), trademark infringement under 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a) (Count II), false designation of origin and unfair competition under 15 U.S.C. § 1125(1)(a) (Count III), unfair trade practices under the statutory laws of New York (Count IV), and common law trademark infringement (Count V) are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
Source: Leagle
