Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Young v. 44 Lamb LLC, 19 Civ. 8432 (PAE) (OTW). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191216583 Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER , District Judge . The Court having been advised by the parties that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, Dkt. 12, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within forty-five days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five days of this Order; a
More

ORDER

The Court having been advised by the parties that all claims asserted herein have been settled in principle, Dkt. 12, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action is hereby dismissed and discontinued without costs, and without prejudice to the right to reopen the action within forty-five days of the date of this Order if the settlement is not consummated.

To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within forty-five days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same 45-day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Per Paragraph 4(C) of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices for Civil Cases, unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer