Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Allah v. Lamanna, 18 CV 8644 (VB). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191216674 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER VINCENT L. BRICCETTI , District Judge . On November 13, 2019, defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint in this Section 1983 action. (Doc. #36). That day, defendants served a copy of the motion and all supporting papers on plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se , via regular mail. ( See Doc. #36-1). Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion was due December 2, 2019. See Local Rule 6.1(b). To date, no response has been filed. Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Co
More

ORDER

On November 13, 2019, defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint in this Section 1983 action. (Doc. #36). That day, defendants served a copy of the motion and all supporting papers on plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, via regular mail. (See Doc. #36-1).

Plaintiff's opposition to defendants' motion was due December 2, 2019. See Local Rule 6.1(b). To date, no response has been filed.

Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Court sua sponte extends plaintiff's time to oppose defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint to January 10, 2020. Defendants' reply, if any, is due January 17, 2020.

2. If plaintiff fails to respond to the motion by January 10, 2020, the motion will be deemed fully submitted and unopposed.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to plaintiff at the address on the docket.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer