Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Megginson v. Camron, 1:18-cv-7206-GHW. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191216b88
Filed: Dec. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS , District Judge . On November 27, 2019, Plaintiff wrote the Court a letter moving, among other things, for summary judgment against Robert Molina. Dkt. No. 40. This letter was captioned with "18cv7206," and so was filed in this action, Megginson v. Camron, et al. Because Plaintiff's letter references Defendant Molina, however, the Court understands this letter as an application in 1:18-cv-05808-GHW, Megginson v. Molina, et al. Mr. Megginson's letter has therefore
More

ORDER

On November 27, 2019, Plaintiff wrote the Court a letter moving, among other things, for summary judgment against Robert Molina. Dkt. No. 40. This letter was captioned with "18cv7206," and so was filed in this action, Megginson v. Camron, et al. Because Plaintiff's letter references Defendant Molina, however, the Court understands this letter as an application in 1:18-cv-05808-GHW, Megginson v. Molina, et al. Mr. Megginson's letter has therefore been docketed in that case and the Court understands that no further action is required of Defendants in this matter.

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff by first class and certified mail.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer