Dominguez v. Taco Bell Corp., 19 Civ. 10172 (LGS). (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20191217f46
Visitors: 3
Filed: Dec. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD , District Judge . WHEREAS, the affidavit of service at Dkt. No. 6 requires Defendant to respond to the Complaint by December 11, 2019. Defendant has not timely responded or otherwise appeared. It is hereby ORDERED that, if Plaintiff is in communication with Defendant, the parties shall file the joint letter and proposed case management plan, in accordance with Dkt. No. 5, by January 7, 2020. If Plaintiff is not in communication with Defendant, then Plaintiff
Summary: ORDER LORNA G. SCHOFIELD , District Judge . WHEREAS, the affidavit of service at Dkt. No. 6 requires Defendant to respond to the Complaint by December 11, 2019. Defendant has not timely responded or otherwise appeared. It is hereby ORDERED that, if Plaintiff is in communication with Defendant, the parties shall file the joint letter and proposed case management plan, in accordance with Dkt. No. 5, by January 7, 2020. If Plaintiff is not in communication with Defendant, then Plaintiff ..
More
ORDER
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge.
WHEREAS, the affidavit of service at Dkt. No. 6 requires Defendant to respond to the Complaint by December 11, 2019. Defendant has not timely responded or otherwise appeared. It is hereby
ORDERED that, if Plaintiff is in communication with Defendant, the parties shall file the joint letter and proposed case management plan, in accordance with Dkt. No. 5, by January 7, 2020. If Plaintiff is not in communication with Defendant, then Plaintiff shall file a letter by January 7, 2020: (1) requesting adjournment of the initial pretrial conference and (2) advising whether it will move for default judgment against Defendant.
Source: Leagle
