Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

RM ex rel. Faust v. City Of New York, 18 Civ. 09763 (RWL). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191219d46 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 18, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER , Magistrate Judge . The parties have filed their settlement agreement with respect to all claims asserted in this action. ( See Dkt. 49.) Accordingly, it is ordered that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed without costs; provided, however, that if the settlement is not consummated within thirty days of this Order, any party may apply by letter within that period to restore the action to the calendar. To be clear, any application t
More

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The parties have filed their settlement agreement with respect to all claims asserted in this action. (See Dkt. 49.) Accordingly, it is ordered that the above-entitled action be, and hereby is, dismissed without costs; provided, however, that if the settlement is not consummated within thirty days of this Order, any party may apply by letter within that period to restore the action to the calendar. To be clear, any application to reopen must be filed within thirty days of this Order, and any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, an order of the Court must be entered to that effect within the thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). Any pending deadlines are cancelled and any motions are dismissed as moot. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer