Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Guglielmo v. Instawares Holding Company, 19 civ 10080 (JGK). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191220g39 Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 19, 2019
Summary: ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE JOHN G. KOELTL , District Judge . It having been reported to this Court that the parties have settled this action, It is, on this 19 th day of December, 2019, hereby ordered that this matter be discontinued with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that within 60 days of the date of this order, counsel for the plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored.
More

ORDER OF DISCONTINUANCE

It having been reported to this Court that the parties have settled this action, It is, on this 19th day of December, 2019, hereby ordered that this matter be discontinued with prejudice but without costs; provided, however, that within 60 days of the date of this order, counsel for the plaintiff may apply by letter for restoration of the action to the calendar of the undersigned, in which event the action will be restored.

Any application to reopen must be filed within sixty (60) days of this order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, if the parties wish for the Court to retain jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the same sixty-day period to be "so ordered" by the Court. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the Court will not retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement unless it is made part of the public record.

All pending motions are dismissed as moot. All conferences are canceled. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer