Matzura v. Interlake R.V. Park, Inc., 19 Civ. 8050 (ER). (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20191226563
Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER EDGARDO RAMOS , District Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that ba
Summary: ORDER EDGARDO RAMOS , District Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof. Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that bas..
More
ORDER
EDGARDO RAMOS, District Judge.
The Court having been advised that the parties have reached a settlement in principle, it is ORDERED that the above-entitled action be and hereby is discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within thirty (30) days of the date hereof.
Any application to reopen must be filed within thirty (30) days of this Order; any application to reopen filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. Further, the parties are advised that if they wish the Court to retain jurisdiction in this matter for purposes of enforcing any settlement agreement, they must submit the settlement agreement to the Court within the next thirty (30) days with a request that the agreement be "so ordered" by the Court.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
