Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Loebel, 17 CR. 170 (KMW). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191226835 Visitors: 12
Filed: Dec. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2019
Summary: CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO SPECIFIC PROPERTY/MONEY JUDGMENT KIMBA M. WOOD , District Judge . WHEREAS, on or about March 20, 2017, BRETT LOEBEL, the defendant (the "Defendant"), was charged in a four-count Information, 17 Cr. 170 (KMW) (the "Information"), with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count One); two counts of wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343, 1349, and 2 (Counts Two
More

CONSENT PRELIMINARY ORDER OF FORFEITURE AS TO SPECIFIC PROPERTY/MONEY JUDGMENT

WHEREAS, on or about March 20, 2017, BRETT LOEBEL, the defendant (the "Defendant"), was charged in a four-count Information, 17 Cr. 170 (KMW) (the "Information"), with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349 (Count One); two counts of wire fraud, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343, 1349, and 2 (Counts Two and Three); and aggravated identity theft, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1028A(a)(1), 1028A(c)(5), and 2 (Count Four);

WHEREAS, the Information included a forfeiture allegation as to Counts One through Three of the Information, seeking forfeiture to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), of any and all property, real and personal, which constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses alleged in Counts One through Three of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Information;

WHEREAS, on or about March 20, 2017, the Defendant pled guilty to Counts One through Four of the Information, pursuant to a plea agreement with the Government, wherein the Defendant admitted the forfeiture allegation as to Counts One through Three of the Information and agreed to forfeit to the United States, pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1)(C), and Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c), any and all property, real and personal, which constitutes, or is derived from, proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses alleged in Counts One through Three of the Information, including but not limited to a sum of money in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the commission of the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Information;

WHEREAS, the defendant consents to the entry of a money judgment in the amount of $600,000 in United States currency representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Information that the defendant personally obtained;

WHEREAS, the defendant further consents to the forfeiture of all his right, title, and interest in $600,000.00 in United States currency that is currently held in a trust account controlled by the Defendant's counsel, David K. Tucker, Esq. (the "Specific Property"), which constitutes proceeds of the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Information;

WHEREAS, the defendant admits that, as a result of acts and/or omissions of the defendant, the proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Information that the defendant personally obtained cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence, with the exception of the Specific Property; and

WHEREAS, pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(g), and Rules 32.2(b)(3), and 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Government is now entitled, pending any assertion of third-party claims, to reduce the Specific Property to its possession and to notify any and all persons who reasonably appear to be a potential claimant of their interest herein;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the United States of America, by its attorney Geoffrey S. Berman, United States Attorney, Assistant United States Attorney David Abramowicz, of counsel, and the Defendant, and his counsel, David Tucker, Esq., that:

1. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Information, to which the defendant pled guilty, a money judgment in the amount of $600,000 in United States currency (the "Money Judgment"), representing the amount of proceeds traceable to the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Information that the defendant personally obtained, shall be entered against the defendant.

2. As a result of the offenses charged in Counts One through Three of the Information, to which the Defendant pled guilty, all of the defendant's right, title and interest in the Specific Property is hereby forfeited to the United States for disposition in accordance with the law, subject to the provisions of Title 18, United States Code, Section 981(a)(1).

3. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, upon entry of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment, this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment is final as to BRETT LOEBEL, the defendant, and shall be deemed part of the sentence of the defendant, and shall be included in the judgment of conviction therewith.

4. All payments on the outstanding Money Judgment shall be made by postal money order, bank or certified check, made payable to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the defendant's name and case number.

5. The United States Marshals Service is authorized to deposit the payments on the Money Judgment in the Assets Forfeiture Fund, and the United States shall have clear title to such forfeited property.

6. Within 30 days of the entry of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment, the defendant's attorney, David Tucker, Esq., shall transfer the Specific Property to the Government by bank or certified check, made payable to the United States Marshals Service, and delivered by mail to the United States Attorney's Office, Southern District of New York, Attn: Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Unit, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007 and shall indicate the defendant's name and case number.

7. Upon entry of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment, the United States Marshals Service or its designee shall be authorized to seize the Specific Property and hold the Specific Property in its secure, custody and control.

8. Pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n)(1), Rule 32.2(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and Rules G(4)(a)(iv)(C) and G(5)(a)(ii) of the Supplemental Rules for Admiralty or Maritime Claims and Asset Forfeiture Actions, the United States shall publish for at least thirty (30) consecutive days on the official government internet forfeiture site, www.forfeiture.gov, notice of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment. Any person, other than the defendant in this case, claiming an interest in the Specific Property must file a petition within sixty (60) days from the first day of publication of the notice on this official government internet site, or no later than thirty-five (35) days from the mailing of actual notice, whichever is earlier.

9. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(6)(A) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Government shall send notice to any person who reasonably appears to be a potential claimant with standing to contest the forfeiture in the ancillary proceeding.

10. This notice referenced in the proceeding paragraphs shall state that the petition shall be for a hearing to adjudicate the validity of the petitioner's alleged interest in the Specific Property, shall be signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury, and shall set forth the nature and extent of the petitioner's right, title and interest in the Specific Property and any additional facts supporting the petitioner's claim and the relief sought, pursuant to 21 United States Code Section 853(n).

11. Upon adjudication of all third-party interests, this Court will enter a Final Order of Forfeiture with respect to the Specific Property pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(n) and Rule 32.2(c)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which all third-party interests will be addressed. All Specific Property forfeited to the United States under a Final Order of Forfeiture shall be applied towards the satisfaction of the Money Judgment.

12. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment, and to amend it as necessary, pursuant to Rule 32.2(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

13. Pursuant to Rule 32.2(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, upon entry of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment, the United States Attorney's Office is authorized to conduct any discovery needed to identify, locate or dispose of forfeitable property, including depositions, interrogatories, requests for production of documents and the issuance of subpoenas.

14. The Clerk of the Court shall forward three certified copies of this Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment to Assistant United States Attorney Alexander Wilson, Chief of the Money Laundering and Asset Forfeiture Unit, United States Attorney's Office, One St. Andrew's Plaza, New York, New York 10007.

15. The signature page of this Consent Preliminary Order of Forfeiture as to Specific Property/Money Judgment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original but all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.

AGREED AND CONSENTED TO: GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York By: ________ 1/8/19 DAVID ABRAMOWICZ DATE Assistant United States Attorney One St. Andrew's Plaza New York, NY 10007 (212) 637-6525 BRETT LOEBEL, DEFENDANT By: ________ 11/9/18 BRETT LOEBEL DATE By: ________ 11/09/18 DAVID K. TUCKER, ESQ. DATE 3001 S.W. 3rd Avenue Miami, FL 33129

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer