Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Mendez v. Sweet Sam's Baking Company, 18-CV-9910 (JMF). (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20191227892 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 26, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JESSE M. FURMAN , District Judge . The parties shall appear on January 10, 2020, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY, for oral argument on their cross-motions to disqualify and preclude. At oral argument, counsel should be prepared to address, in addition to the arguments and issues addressed in their memoranda of law, whether Mr. Androphy's testimony and email — even if relev
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The parties shall appear on January 10, 2020, at 10:15 a.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY, for oral argument on their cross-motions to disqualify and preclude. At oral argument, counsel should be prepared to address, in addition to the arguments and issues addressed in their memoranda of law, whether Mr. Androphy's testimony and email — even if relevant to Mr. Perez's credibility — are inadmissible under Rule 608(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence as extrinsic evidence of specific conduct. See, e.g., Lewis v. Baker, 526 F.2d 470, 475 (2d Cir. 1975) ("The relevancy of testimony which aids in the jury's determination of a party's credibility and veracity has been repeatedly affirmed. Although an opponent is not permitted to adduce extrinsic evidence that a party lied on a previous occasion, he may nonetheless ask questions to that end." (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer