Calcano v. Adidas America, Inc., 1:19-cv-10060-LGS. (2019)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200121a41
Visitors: 7
Filed: Dec. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 27, 2019
Summary: PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE LORNA G. SCHOFIELD , District Judge . Plaintiff, Marcos Calcano, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this response in opposition to Defendant's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing ( Dkt. 12 ), and in support thereof states: 1. Gregory F. Hurley ("Hurley") is a California attorney not admitted to practice in the State of New
Summary: PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE LORNA G. SCHOFIELD , District Judge . Plaintiff, Marcos Calcano, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this response in opposition to Defendant's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing ( Dkt. 12 ), and in support thereof states: 1. Gregory F. Hurley ("Hurley") is a California attorney not admitted to practice in the State of New Y..
More
PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO MOTION FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE
LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Marcos Calcano, by and through his undersigned counsel, hereby files this response in opposition to Defendant's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing (Dkt. 12), and in support thereof states:
1. Gregory F. Hurley ("Hurley") is a California attorney not admitted to practice in the State of New York.
2. Movant requests the Court disqualify Hurley from further appearance pro hac vice in this case before this court.
3. In his Declaration, Hurley states in paragraph 3, "I have never been censured, suspended, disbarred or denied admission or readmission by any court."
4. Attached as Exhibit 1 is a copy of Dkt. 12 on the docket in Lucius v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc., (SDFL 19-cv-23532) an Order denying Mr. Hurley's Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.
5. Attached as Exhibit 2 is a copy of Dkt. 11 in Lucius, opposing Mr. Hurley's admission.
6. Based upon Magistrate Judge Torres' Order above, Your Movant is unable to determine if Mr. Hurley was truthful in his Declaration herein, wherein he stated that he was "never... denied admission... by any court."
7. Accordingly, Your Movant opposes Mr. Hurley's admission in this case until this apparent discrepancy is further examined and clarified to the satisfaction of the Court.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Marcos Calcano, respectfully requests this Court to delay the approval of Mr. Hurley's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice until the issues raised herein have been determined.
Plaintiff's motion to disqualify counsel is DENIED. The explanation offered by Mr. Hurley in his Declaration in further support of his motion for admission pro hac vice (Dkt. No. 19) is sufficient to explain the discrepancy identified by Plaintiff. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the open motion at Dkt. No. 15.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
