Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Smith v. Olympus Growth Fumd VI, L.P., 19 Civ. 7069 (AT). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200113698 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jan. 08, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2020
Summary: ORDER ANALISA TORRES , District Judge . Having reviewed the parties' proposed redactions to submissions filed under seal, it is hereby ORDERED that by January 17, 2020, the parties shall file their submissions with redactions to the public docket. Additionally, on December 12, 2019, in an order filed under seal, the Court dismissed, without prejudice, the claims brought by Liqui-Box, Inc. and Liqui-Box Holdings, Inc. (together, "Liqui-Box") against David S. Smith (Ireland) Unlimited Com
More

ORDER

Having reviewed the parties' proposed redactions to submissions filed under seal, it is hereby ORDERED that by January 17, 2020, the parties shall file their submissions with redactions to the public docket.

Additionally, on December 12, 2019, in an order filed under seal, the Court dismissed, without prejudice, the claims brought by Liqui-Box, Inc. and Liqui-Box Holdings, Inc. (together, "Liqui-Box") against David S. Smith (Ireland) Unlimited Company, DS Smith (UK) Limited, DS Smith International Limited, DS Smith (Luxembourg) S.Á R.L., DS Smith Packaging Holdings B.V., David S. Smith (Netherlands) B.V., DS Smith Packaging Belita B.V., and DS Smith Holdings Limited (together, "DS Smith").

Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Liqui-Box as Plaintiffs and terminate D.S. Smith as Defendants. DS Smith's claims against Liqui-Box and additional counterclaim Defendant Olympus Growth Fund VI, L.P., however, remain.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer