Naranjo v. United States, 13 CR 351-1. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200115h77
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 13, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT JED S. RAKOFF , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated January 13, 2020, the Report and Recommendation is adopted, and the petition is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. Moreover, the Court certifies that any appeal from the Order would n
Summary: JUDGMENT JED S. RAKOFF , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated January 13, 2020, the Report and Recommendation is adopted, and the petition is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. 2253. Moreover, the Court certifies that any appeal from the Order would no..
More
JUDGMENT
JED S. RAKOFF, District Judge.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated January 13, 2020, the Report and Recommendation is adopted, and the petition is dismissed with prejudice. In addition, because petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Moreover, the Court certifies that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, as petitioner's claim lacks any arguable basis in law or fact, and therefore permission to proceed in forma pauperis is also denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).
Source: Leagle
