Collymore v. City of New York, 16-CV-8270 (LTS) (OTW). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200116e81
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 15, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 15, 2020
Summary: ORDER ONA T. WANG , Magistrate Judge . The Court has reviewed Defendants' proposed agenda and Plaintiff's response. (ECF 93-94). The January 16, 2020 Status Conference is hereby converted to a Telephone Status Conference. Please call Chambers at 212-805-0260 at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, January 16, 2020 when all counsel are on the line. Because the parties agree that the ESI protocol dispute is the primary reason for the current delay in discovery, the call will be limited to discussion o
Summary: ORDER ONA T. WANG , Magistrate Judge . The Court has reviewed Defendants' proposed agenda and Plaintiff's response. (ECF 93-94). The January 16, 2020 Status Conference is hereby converted to a Telephone Status Conference. Please call Chambers at 212-805-0260 at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, January 16, 2020 when all counsel are on the line. Because the parties agree that the ESI protocol dispute is the primary reason for the current delay in discovery, the call will be limited to discussion of..
More
ORDER
ONA T. WANG, Magistrate Judge.
The Court has reviewed Defendants' proposed agenda and Plaintiff's response. (ECF 93-94). The January 16, 2020 Status Conference is hereby converted to a Telephone Status Conference. Please call Chambers at 212-805-0260 at 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, January 16, 2020 when all counsel are on the line.
Because the parties agree that the ESI protocol dispute is the primary reason for the current delay in discovery, the call will be limited to discussion of that issue only, particularly whether any party objects to use of the Court's Model Joint Electronic Discovery Submission, and, if so, why. The Court will make efforts to ensure that the call proceeds as efficiently as possible—and expects the parties to cooperate—in order to permit Plaintiff's counsel to expeditiously return to her deposition in Gittens-Bridges v. City of New York, No. 19-CV-272 (ER) (S.D.N.Y.). The Court thanks Defendants' counsel in Gittens-Bridges for their understanding. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve a copy of this Order and ECF 92 on Defendants' counsel in Gittens-Bridges.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
