Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Citizens Union of the City of New York v. The Attorney General of the State of New York, 16-cv-9592 (DLC) (KHP). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200127587 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 21, 2020
Summary: ORDER AND JUDGMENT DENISE L. COTE , District Judge . AND NOW, upon consideration of the Court's September 30, 2019 Opinion and Order, which granted summary judgment for Plaintiffs 1 and held that both N.Y. Executive Law 172-e and N.Y. Executive Law 172-f are facially unconstitutional (Dkt. 178), 2 it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Final judgment is ENTERED in favor of Plaintiffs in accordance with the Court's September 30, 2019 Opinion and Order. 2. Defendant Attorney General of the Sta
More

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

AND NOW, upon consideration of the Court's September 30, 2019 Opinion and Order, which granted summary judgment for Plaintiffs1 and held that both N.Y. Executive Law § 172-e and N.Y. Executive Law § 172-f are facially unconstitutional (Dkt. 178),2 it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Final judgment is ENTERED in favor of Plaintiffs in accordance with the Court's September 30, 2019 Opinion and Order.

2. Defendant Attorney General of the State of New York is PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from taking any action to enforce, or direct the enforcement of, N.Y. Executive Law § 172-e and N.Y. Executive Law § 172-f, and shall not seek to hold any person or entity liable for alleged noncompliance with N.Y. Executive Law § 172-e or N.Y. Executive Law § 172-f.

3. The New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics (JCOPE) and its members are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from taking any action to enforce, or direct the enforcement of, N.Y. Executive Law § 172-e and N.Y. Executive Law § 172-f, and shall not seek to hold any person or entity liable for alleged noncompliance with N.Y. Executive Law § 172-e or N.Y. Executive Law § 172-f, in accordance with the Stipulation and Order between the Citizens Unions Plaintiffs, the ACLU Plaintiffs, and JCOPE, dated January 4, 2017. See Dkt. 32 ¶¶ 3-4; see also American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Inc. v. Agata, No. 16 cv 9854 (S.D.N.Y.) Dkt. 33 ¶¶ 3-4.

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Plaintiffs in this consolidated action are Citizens Union of the City of New York and Citizens Union Foundation, Inc. of the City of New York ("Citizens Union Plaintiffs"); American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, Inc., New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, and New York Civil Liberties Union ("ACLU Plaintiffs"); and Lawyers Alliance for New York and Nonprofit Coordinating Committee of New York ("Lawyers Alliance Plaintiffs").
2. On January 10, 2020, the Court so-ordered the parties' Stipulation of Settlement for Fees and Costs, which resolved Plaintiffs' motions for attorney's fees. Dkt. No. 205.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer