Stulz Air Technology Systems, Inc. v. Figliolia, 18 Civ. 3694 (ER). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200128e05
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 27, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 27, 2020
Summary: ORDER EDGARDO RAMOS , District Judge . On October 16, 2019, Plaintiffs asked the Court to enter a discovery protective order on its behalf. Doc. 55. For the reasons set forth on the record during the December 6, 2019 discovery conference, the request for a protective order is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 55. It is SO ORDERED.
ORDER
EDGARDO RAMOS, District Judge.
On October 16, 2019, Plaintiffs asked the Court to enter a discovery protective order on its behalf. Doc. 55. For the reasons set forth on the record during the December 6, 2019 discovery conference, the request for a protective order is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 55.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
