Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Marat-Uulu v. United States, 17-CR-0350-17 (LAP). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200130750 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 23, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2020
Summary: ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. 2255 LORETTA A. PRESKA , District Judge . The Court, having concluded that the motion brought under 28 U.S.C. 2255 should not be summarily dismissed as being without merit, hereby ORDERS that: The Clerk of Court shall electronically notify the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York that this order has been issued. Within sixty days of the date of this order, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file an answer or oth
More

ORDER TO ANSWER, 28 U.S.C. § 2255

The Court, having concluded that the motion brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 should not be summarily dismissed as being without merit, hereby ORDERS that:

The Clerk of Court shall electronically notify the Criminal Division of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York that this order has been issued.

Within sixty days of the date of this order, the U.S. Attorney's Office shall file an answer or other pleadings in response to the motion. Movant shall have thirty days from the date on which Movant is served with Respondent's answer to file a response. Absent further order, the motion will be considered fully submitted as of that date.

All further papers filed or submitted for filing must include the criminal docket number and will be docketed in the criminal case.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer