Hughes v. Benjamin, 17 Civil 6493 (RJS). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200204d96
Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 03, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 03, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT RICHARD J. SULLIVAN , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 3, 2020, Benjamin's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Although Hughes has not requested leave to amend the Complaint, the Court notes that leave to amend would be futile. The Court's analysis above is principally based on its review of the two works at issue and the context in which they were posted, rather than any allegation
Summary: JUDGMENT RICHARD J. SULLIVAN , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 3, 2020, Benjamin's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Although Hughes has not requested leave to amend the Complaint, the Court notes that leave to amend would be futile. The Court's analysis above is principally based on its review of the two works at issue and the context in which they were posted, rather than any allegations..
More
JUDGMENT
RICHARD J. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 3, 2020, Benjamin's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Although Hughes has not requested leave to amend the Complaint, the Court notes that leave to amend would be futile. The Court's analysis above is principally based on its review of the two works at issue and the context in which they were posted, rather than any allegations that may be refined in amended pleadings. Thus, the dismissal is with prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed.
Source: Leagle
