United States v. Schulte, S-2 17 Cr. 548 (PAC). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200205g52
Visitors: 5
Filed: Feb. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2020
Summary: ORDER PAUL A. CROTTY , District Judge . The Government's letter of January 31, 2020 provides that Exhibit 616 was marked as unclassified prior to June 27, 2019. Accordingly, Exhibit 616 should be admitted with the "UNCLASSIFIED" marking, which reflects the form that the Defendant would have seen the document in while he worked for the Central Intelligence Agency. The Court's ruling on the classification markings of other documents, including, inter alia, "network diagrams" remains as set
Summary: ORDER PAUL A. CROTTY , District Judge . The Government's letter of January 31, 2020 provides that Exhibit 616 was marked as unclassified prior to June 27, 2019. Accordingly, Exhibit 616 should be admitted with the "UNCLASSIFIED" marking, which reflects the form that the Defendant would have seen the document in while he worked for the Central Intelligence Agency. The Court's ruling on the classification markings of other documents, including, inter alia, "network diagrams" remains as set f..
More
ORDER
PAUL A. CROTTY, District Judge.
The Government's letter of January 31, 2020 provides that Exhibit 616 was marked as unclassified prior to June 27, 2019. Accordingly, Exhibit 616 should be admitted with the "UNCLASSIFIED" marking, which reflects the form that the Defendant would have seen the document in while he worked for the Central Intelligence Agency. The Court's ruling on the classification markings of other documents, including, inter alia, "network diagrams" remains as set forth in the Court's Section 6(c) opinion. (See Section 6(c) Order, at 9.)
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
