Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ikedilo v. Statter, 19-CV-9967 (RA). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200214878 Visitors: 6
Filed: Feb. 10, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 10, 2020
Summary: ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS , District Judge . On December 27, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. 24. Pursuant to the briefing schedule jointly proposed by the parties and endorsed by the Court, Dkt. 22, Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion was due by February 6, 2020. The Court has not received a response. No later than February 14, 2020, Plaintiff shall file either a response in opposition to Defendants' mot
More

ORDER

On December 27, 2019, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff's complaint under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Dkt. 24. Pursuant to the briefing schedule jointly proposed by the parties and endorsed by the Court, Dkt. 22, Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion was due by February 6, 2020. The Court has not received a response.

No later than February 14, 2020, Plaintiff shall file either a response in opposition to Defendants' motion or a letter indicating that she does not intend to file a response. If Plaintiff chooses not to submit a response in opposition to the motion to dismiss, the Court will deem the motion fully briefed and take it under submission. If, however, Plaintiff does not respond to this Order, either by responding to the motion to dismiss or submitting a letter indicating that she does not intend to do so, the Court may dismiss this action for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

If Plaintiff files a response in opposition to Defendants' motion to dismiss by February 14, 2020, Defendants shall have one week to file a reply.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer