Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Liu, 19-CR-804 (VEC). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200219h82 Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 14, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2020
Summary: ORDER VALERIE CAPRONI , District Judge . WHEREAS the Parties appeared for a conference on February 14, 2020; WHEREAS the Court arraigned Defendant on the superseding (S1) indictment; and WHEREAS Defendant pled not guilty; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Government's CIPA Section 4 motion is due no later than April 17, 2020. IT IS FURTHER ORDERD that Defendant's pretrial motions (except motions in limine), if any, are due no later than April 17, 2020. The Government must oppose no late
More

ORDER

WHEREAS the Parties appeared for a conference on February 14, 2020;

WHEREAS the Court arraigned Defendant on the superseding (S1) indictment; and

WHEREAS Defendant pled not guilty;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Government's CIPA Section 4 motion is due no later than April 17, 2020.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERD that Defendant's pretrial motions (except motions in limine), if any, are due no later than April 17, 2020. The Government must oppose no later than May 1, 2020. Defendant may reply no later than May 8, 2020.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that jury selection and trial will begin on July 13, 2020, at 10:00 a.m. The Court will hold a final pretrial conference on July 9, 2020, at 2:00 p.m. The Government's § 3500 and Giglio materials, pre-marked exhibits and exhibit list, and witness list are due July 8, 2020. Requests to charge and proposed voir dire questions are due June 22, 2020. The Parties should submit only those voir dire questions that are unique to this case. Motions in limine are due June 8, 2020, and responses are due June 15, 2020.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government must submit a letter certifying completion of discovery productions no later than February 28, 2020.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that time is excluded under the Speedy Trial Act between February 14, 2020, and July 13, 2020, because the Court finds that the ends of justice served by giving Defendant time to review the voluminous discovery in this case outweigh the best interests of the public and of Defendant in a speedy trial.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer