United States v. Acosta, 93-CR-1074-01 (PAE). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200224c19
Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 21, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER , District Judge . For the reasons stated on the record at today's conference: • The Probation Department has withdrawn its specification alleging a violation of supervised release involving failure to report. • The defendant's supervised release term is to be treated as having started October 16, 2019, when the defendant's state custody terminated. • The defendant shall be permitted to travel to, and reside in, the District of Connecticut during his term of supe
Summary: ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER , District Judge . For the reasons stated on the record at today's conference: • The Probation Department has withdrawn its specification alleging a violation of supervised release involving failure to report. • The defendant's supervised release term is to be treated as having started October 16, 2019, when the defendant's state custody terminated. • The defendant shall be permitted to travel to, and reside in, the District of Connecticut during his term of super..
More
ORDER
PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge.
For the reasons stated on the record at today's conference:
• The Probation Department has withdrawn its specification alleging a violation of supervised release involving failure to report.
• The defendant's supervised release term is to be treated as having started October 16, 2019, when the defendant's state custody terminated.
• The defendant shall be permitted to travel to, and reside in, the District of Connecticut during his term of supervised release.
• The defendant is to be supervised in a district to be determined by the U.S. Probation Department.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
