Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pacelli v. Augustus Intelligence, Inc., 20-cv-1011 (LJL). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200225c64 Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER LEWIS J. LIMAN , District Judge . The Court has received a fully-submitted Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. No. 5). Although sur-replies are not routinely ordered or granted, the Court exercises its discretion to permit Plaintiffs to respond to the arguments presented in the final two paragraphs of Defendant's Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. No. 12, p. 10-11) ("Plaintiffs argue there are claims in their Complaint not subject to the Arbitr
More

ORDER

The Court has received a fully-submitted Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. No. 5). Although sur-replies are not routinely ordered or granted, the Court exercises its discretion to permit Plaintiffs to respond to the arguments presented in the final two paragraphs of Defendant's Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of the Motion to Compel Arbitration (Dkt. No. 12, p. 10-11) ("Plaintiffs argue there are claims in their Complaint not subject to the Arbitration Agreement. . . [citations to] 388 U.S. 395, 403-04, 87 S.Ct. 1801, 1805-06, 18 L.Ed.2d 1270 (1967).").

Should Plaintiffs wish to respond to those final two paragraphs, they may submit a sur-reply letter not to exceed two pages in length by Wednesday, February 26 at 5:00 p.m. Plaintiffs' letter should not present argument with respect to other issues in the briefing.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer