Vasquez v. County of Rockland, 13 CIVIL 5632 (SLC). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200226c23
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 25, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT SARAH L. CAVE , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 24 2020, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 is granted in its entirety and all of Vasquez's claims are dismissed; accordingly, this case is closed. The Court further declines to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)(A), as Vasquez has not
Summary: JUDGMENT SARAH L. CAVE , Magistrate Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 24 2020, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 is granted in its entirety and all of Vasquez's claims are dismissed; accordingly, this case is closed. The Court further declines to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(1)(A), as Vasquez has not ..
More
JUDGMENT
SARAH L. CAVE, Magistrate Judge.
It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 24 2020, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 is granted in its entirety and all of Vasquez's claims are dismissed; accordingly, this case is closed. The Court further declines to issue a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A), as Vasquez has not "made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2),
Source: Leagle
