Kent-Friedman v. New York Insurance Fund, 18-cv-04422 (VM)(OTW). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200227848
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2020
Summary: RULE 502(d) ORDER ONA T. WANG , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, the parties jointly request that this Court issue an order, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and the Court's inherent authority, which will allow the parties in this action to conduct and respond to discovery without fear that disclosure of privileged or protected information will automatically waive such privilege or protection in this or any other action or proceeding: IT IS THEREFORE AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIE
Summary: RULE 502(d) ORDER ONA T. WANG , Magistrate Judge . WHEREAS, the parties jointly request that this Court issue an order, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and the Court's inherent authority, which will allow the parties in this action to conduct and respond to discovery without fear that disclosure of privileged or protected information will automatically waive such privilege or protection in this or any other action or proceeding: IT IS THEREFORE AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES..
More
RULE 502(d) ORDER
ONA T. WANG, Magistrate Judge.
WHEREAS, the parties jointly request that this Court issue an order, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d) and the Court's inherent authority, which will allow the parties in this action to conduct and respond to discovery without fear that disclosure of privileged or protected information will automatically waive such privilege or protection in this or any other action or proceeding:
IT IS THEREFORE AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AND ORDERED THAT:
1. The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, electronically stored information ("ESI") or information, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d).
2. Nothing contained herein is intended to or shall serve to limit a party's right to conduct a review of documents, ESI, or information (including metadata) for relevance, responsiveness, and/or segregation of privileged and/or protected information before production.
Dated: February 10, 2020 Dated: February 7, 2020
New York, New York New York, New York
SAMUEL MADUEGBUNA LETITIA JAMES
Attorney for Plaintiffs Attorney General of the State of New York
Attorney for Defendants New York
State Insurance Fund, Madoff,
O'Brien, Cusick & Mullen
________
SAMUEL MADUEGBUNA By:
Maduegbuna Cooper LLP
Attorneys at Law ________
30 Wall Street, 8th Fl By: MATTHEW CONRAD
New York, New York 10005 Assistant Attorney General
Tel: (212) 232-0155 28 Liberty Street, 17th Floor
New York, New York 10005
Tel. (212) 416-6352
Dated: February ___, 2020
New York, New York
PATRICIA PREZIOSO
Attorney for Defendant Dormin
________
PATRICIA PREZIOSO
Porzio Bromberg & Newman P.C.
100 Southgate Parkway Box 1997
Morristown, New Jersey 07962
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
