Hamid v. Sonali Exchange Co., 1:19-cv-07574 (PGG) (SDA). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200302b33
Visitors: 9
Filed: Feb. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER STEWART D. AARON , Magistrate Judge . STEWART D. AARON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Based upon the call held with the Parties and the undersigned on February 26, 2020, it is the Court's understanding that Plaintiff intends to dismiss Defendants Sonali Bank, Ltd. ("Sonali Bank") and Mohammad Ataur Rahman Prodhan ("Prodhan"). While his Amended Complaint excludes them as named Defendants ( see ECF No. 26), Plaintiff has not filed a stipulation of dismissal. If Plaintiff intends
Summary: ORDER STEWART D. AARON , Magistrate Judge . STEWART D. AARON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Based upon the call held with the Parties and the undersigned on February 26, 2020, it is the Court's understanding that Plaintiff intends to dismiss Defendants Sonali Bank, Ltd. ("Sonali Bank") and Mohammad Ataur Rahman Prodhan ("Prodhan"). While his Amended Complaint excludes them as named Defendants ( see ECF No. 26), Plaintiff has not filed a stipulation of dismissal. If Plaintiff intends t..
More
ORDER
STEWART D. AARON, Magistrate Judge.
STEWART D. AARON, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:
Based upon the call held with the Parties and the undersigned on February 26, 2020, it is the Court's understanding that Plaintiff intends to dismiss Defendants Sonali Bank, Ltd. ("Sonali Bank") and Mohammad Ataur Rahman Prodhan ("Prodhan"). While his Amended Complaint excludes them as named Defendants (see ECF No. 26), Plaintiff has not filed a stipulation of dismissal.
If Plaintiff intends to dismiss Defendants Sonali Bank and Prodhan, no later than Wednesday, March 4, 2020, he shall file a stipulation of dismissal as to Defendants Sonali Bank and Prodhan pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
