Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Zhang v. New Beijing Wok, Inc., 17 CIVIL 9465 (YEC). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200305f94 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 04, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 04, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT VALERIE E. CAPRONI , District Judge . It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 3, 2020, 1. Baoji Zhang is entitled to judgment against Beijing Wok in the amount of $158,794.02, of which Shanghai Chinese is jointly and severally liable for $3,342.16. 2. Baoji Zhang is entitled to prejudgment interest against Beijing Wok in the amount of $41,595.55, of which Shanghai Chinese is jointly and severally liable for $296.
More

JUDGMENT

It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated March 3, 2020,

1. Baoji Zhang is entitled to judgment against Beijing Wok in the amount of $158,794.02, of which Shanghai Chinese is jointly and severally liable for $3,342.16. 2. Baoji Zhang is entitled to prejudgment interest against Beijing Wok in the amount of $41,595.55, of which Shanghai Chinese is jointly and severally liable for $296.93. 3. Guo Dong Yao is entitled to judgment against Beijing Wok in the amount of $127,409.40, of which Shanghai Chinese is jointly and severally liable for $2,485.66. 4. Guo Dong Yao is entitled to prejudgment interest against Beijing Wok in the amount of $32,821.94, of which Shanghai Chinese is jointly and severally liable for $129.27. 5. Plaintiffs are entitled to an award of attorneys' fees of $71,176.75, of which Shanghai Chinese is jointly and severally liable for $1,234.37. 6. Plaintiffs are entitled to attorneys' costs of $4,703.64 from Beijing Wok and Shanghai Chinese, jointly and severally; accordingly, the case is closed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer