Hausler v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 09 Civ. 10289 (VM). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200309a47
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 06, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2020
Summary: ORDER VICTOR MARRERO , District Judge . A review of the Docket Sheet for this case indicates that there has been no record of any proceedings or correspondence with the Court since October 17, 2019. At that time the Court granted a motion to substitute a party pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25. The Court previously granted an extension until January 17, 2020, of the levies covering certain accounts. ( See Dkt. No. 691.) Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that petitioner info
Summary: ORDER VICTOR MARRERO , District Judge . A review of the Docket Sheet for this case indicates that there has been no record of any proceedings or correspondence with the Court since October 17, 2019. At that time the Court granted a motion to substitute a party pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25. The Court previously granted an extension until January 17, 2020, of the levies covering certain accounts. ( See Dkt. No. 691.) Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that petitioner infor..
More
ORDER
VICTOR MARRERO, District Judge.
A review of the Docket Sheet for this case indicates that there has been no record of any proceedings or correspondence with the Court since October 17, 2019. At that time the Court granted a motion to substitute a party pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25. The Court previously granted an extension until January 17, 2020, of the levies covering certain accounts. (See Dkt. No. 691.) Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that petitioner inform the Court, within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, concerning the status of this action and petitioner's contemplation with regard to any further proceedings. In the event no timely response to this Order is submitted, the Court may dismiss the action without further notice for lack of prosecution.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
