Henry v. Weche, 17-CV-5683 (NSR). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200319603
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2020
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL NELSON S. ROM N , District Judge . Plaintiff Christopher A. Henry ("Plaintiff"), proceeding pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 on July 26, 2017, alleging violations of his constitutional rights by Defendant Gregory Weche ("Defendant"). (ECF No. 1). On February 4, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause directing Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before March 2, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for want
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL NELSON S. ROM N , District Judge . Plaintiff Christopher A. Henry ("Plaintiff"), proceeding pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 on July 26, 2017, alleging violations of his constitutional rights by Defendant Gregory Weche ("Defendant"). (ECF No. 1). On February 4, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause directing Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before March 2, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for want o..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
NELSON S. ROMÁN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Christopher A. Henry ("Plaintiff"), proceeding pro se, commenced this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on July 26, 2017, alleging violations of his constitutional rights by Defendant Gregory Weche ("Defendant"). (ECF No. 1). On February 4, 2020, the Court issued an Order to Show Cause directing Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before March 2, 2020, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for want of prosecution pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (ECF No. 13.) In the Order to Show Cause, the Court delineated Plaintiff's failure to take any steps to prosecute this action for nearly two years. To date, Plaintiff has failed to communicate with the Court or otherwise respond to the Order to Show Cause.
Accordingly, due to Plaintiff's failure to prosecute this action, the action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate this action. The Clerk of the Court is further directed to serve a copy of this Order on Plaintiff at the address listed on the docket and file proof of service on the docket.
This constitutes the Order of the Court.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
