Huang v. Shanghai City Corp, 19-cv-7702 (LJL). (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200319b86
Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER LEWIS J. LIMAN , District Judge . As discussed at the telephonic conference held today, the following is HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Without objection from any party, the deadline for completion of all fact discovery is ADJOURNED to June 22, 2020. All intermediate fact discovery deadlines (for example, for interrogatories, depositions, requests to admit, and all other categories specified in Dkt. No. 56 8(b)-(f)) may be determined by consent of the parties, so long as they permit fact di
Summary: ORDER LEWIS J. LIMAN , District Judge . As discussed at the telephonic conference held today, the following is HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Without objection from any party, the deadline for completion of all fact discovery is ADJOURNED to June 22, 2020. All intermediate fact discovery deadlines (for example, for interrogatories, depositions, requests to admit, and all other categories specified in Dkt. No. 56 8(b)-(f)) may be determined by consent of the parties, so long as they permit fact dis..
More
ORDER
LEWIS J. LIMAN, District Judge.
As discussed at the telephonic conference held today, the following is HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Without objection from any party, the deadline for completion of all fact discovery is ADJOURNED to June 22, 2020. All intermediate fact discovery deadlines (for example, for interrogatories, depositions, requests to admit, and all other categories specified in Dkt. No. 56 ¶ 8(b)-(f)) may be determined by consent of the parties, so long as they permit fact discovery to be completed by June 22, 2020. This deadline supersedes all others previously issued in the case.
2. A post-discovery status conference is SET for July 6, 2020 at 4:00 p.m. in Courtroom 15C of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, 500 Pearl Street, New York, New York.
3. In order to protect public health while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(3) and (b)(4), that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means, and may be recorded by any reliable audio or audiovisual means.
4. Defendant Mimi Si may file any motion for summary judgment after the close of fact discovery and not before that time.
5. As discussed at the telephonic conference, a motion for sanctions may be filed with respect to the two deponents referenced in Defendants' letter-motion (Dkt. No. 78) and Plaintiffs' letter-motion (Dkt. No. 81) in response. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to TERMINATE the motions in Dkt. Nos. 78 and 81.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
