United States v. Washington, 1:20-cr-69-GHW. (2020)
Court: District Court, S.D. New York
Number: infdco20200319c09
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS , District Judge . A status conference is scheduled to take place in this case on April 1, 2020. In the wake of COVID-19, the Court directs the parties to confer regarding the status of the case and to submit a letter to the Court regarding their respective views regarding the appropriate next steps in the case. The joint letter should set forth each of the parties' respective views regarding a motion briefing schedule, and a trial date. To the extent that the defend
Summary: ORDER GREGORY H. WOODS , District Judge . A status conference is scheduled to take place in this case on April 1, 2020. In the wake of COVID-19, the Court directs the parties to confer regarding the status of the case and to submit a letter to the Court regarding their respective views regarding the appropriate next steps in the case. The joint letter should set forth each of the parties' respective views regarding a motion briefing schedule, and a trial date. To the extent that the defenda..
More
ORDER
GREGORY H. WOODS, District Judge.
A status conference is scheduled to take place in this case on April 1, 2020. In the wake of COVID-19, the Court directs the parties to confer regarding the status of the case and to submit a letter to the Court regarding their respective views regarding the appropriate next steps in the case. The joint letter should set forth each of the parties' respective views regarding a motion briefing schedule, and a trial date. To the extent that the defendants anticipate filing motions under F.R. Cr. P. 12(b)(3), the defendants are directed to identify the nature of the anticipated motions, so that the Court can schedule a hearing if appropriate. The parties are directed to state their views regarding the exclusion of time with respect to any proposed schedule. The parties are directed to file that joint letter no later than March 26, 2020.
In the event that parties are able to present a proposed schedule for the litigation of this case that the Court can adopt by written order without the need for an in-person conference, and the joint letter identifies no other issues that require resolution through an in-person conference, the Court expects that it will adjourn the April 1, 2020 conference.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
